11. Email #2 is even less incriminating. Miranda passes along info about what the @SenJudiciary Dems are up to, but it sounds like it could easily have been gleaned through backchanneling, Capitol Hill gossip, etc.pic.twitter.com/2f8rrTqpUS
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You're saying he didn't lie in saying he didn't know at the time that they were stolen. But in 2006, when the memo stealing by Miranda was known, he *insisted* to Kennedy that he had never *seen* any of the stolen memos (video in link). That was perjury.https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/judge-brett-kavanaugh-should-be-impeached-for-lying-during-his-confirmation-hearings.html …
The Barbara Ledeen who was conducting her own private investigation into Hillary’s emails? I know that has naught to do with Kavanaugh, but Ledeen is an hyper-partisan creep too.
She works for Grassley and the SJC.
Did you defend “confidential” emails on HRC’s private server with the same spin that you use to defend K’s lies? The claim that he would not have known info was stolen is ludicrous. If he is that stupid, he doesn’t belong on SCt. Good thing you aren’t a criminal defense lawyer.
But he testified in 2004 and 2006 with the benefit of hindsight. That’s what makes it look so calculated
Bonjour please find the unroll here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1038129597689278464.html …
Share this if you think it's interesting. 
@threadreaderapp unroll please
Hello the unroll you asked for: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1038129597689278464.html …
Talk to you soon. 
Trying your best to link and then saying has nothing to do with Kavanaugh is simple fake news.
What's your point?
Barbara Ledeen, who works for the Senate Judiciary Committee?
A different angle ...
We are having a very reasonable/serious/substantive debate about whether #Kavanaugh perjured himself ...
Hmmm ...
Truly a qualifying characteristic for someone being rushed through confirmation hearings for #SCOTUS?
Appreciate your analysis even if disagree on other related issues.
Again moral flexibility is fine in our Machiavellian world. John Rawls must be turning in his grave to see what we are calling a just society and a justice to be on the SCOTUS.

@JeffFlake @KamalaHarris @CoryBooker @SenatorLeahy @SenFeinstein
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.