For what it's worth, Kav was a "Bcc:" on the supposedly damning email that is suggested to refute his claim of "not [being] involved in handling" Pryor's nomination. Don't know about others, but I'm definitely involved in many conversations about matters I'm not handling.
-
-
As a general rule, unless given excellent evidence to the contrary, I find that assuming the opposite of anything AT LEAST says is a very safe bet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NotPeoriaMayor @IReadAboutStuff and
ESPECIALLY of it is written by Elie.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Unfortunately, ATL is not the only one running with this issue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I just posted a super-long series of tweets on this "perjury" argument, for anyone who's interested. #SCOTUS #KavanaughHearings #KavanaughConfirmationHearings
2:45 PM - 6 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.