That doesn’t necessarily mean that it doesn’t matter who is being nominated and appointed to the #SCOTUS
-
-
-
Of course, and I didn't mean to suggest
#SCOTUS is anything less than critical; I just question whether public opinion polls like this one shed much light on Kavanaugh's confirmation chances:https://cnn.it/2waxWAg -
Public polls about anything related to legal system matters are of dubious value at best. Even if conducted among exclusively Suits fans
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interestingly, public opinion on matters the public knows little about can in fact be politically important.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is also a fairly snooze-worthy SCOTUS confirmation so far. The document request battle feels like background noise, and we're too busy following Omarosa's book/tapes and debating security clearances.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Frankly, I'm surprised that 40% could name one
-
Me too. I would've pegged it at around 20% maybe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There actually was an earlier opinion poll. Anyone paying attention knew that the 2016 election was all about SCOTUS. Unless we find that Russians caused Trump to win (and I doubt that, although I don’t doubt the meddling occurred), it’s the poll that matters.
-
But if they were going to poll and draw conclusions, Media should also have asked the source of people’s information (media) and how much negative v positive about the candidate they had heard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good point. If they knew more, he would likely have much lower approval numbers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IMO polls are useless for anything much more nuanced than "do you plan to vote for candidate A or candidate B?" People must interpret questions, then pollsters must interpret answers. Too much subjectivity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not even Judge Wapner or Judge Judy?
#SupremecourtThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Furthermore, if the Senate won't push back on Trump despite stats that he only has support around 30% of the voting public but 75% of Rs, I can't see them worrying about lack of support for Kavanaugh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
people need to get their shit together.
#CourtsMatterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well part of that 60% is whatever % still fully support Trump regardless & they not only can't name the SCOTUS justices, but are virtually clueless of other current events that haven't had the dots connected for them by Limbaugh to ensure events interpreted only as he views them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Easy. Judge Judy. Nailed it...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
makes me sad to realize how little the average person knows about anything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.