Better response might be "the immigration law system is inherently unjust, so anyone who works in it is complicit" - but my response to that would be, these EOIR law clerks are helping to give immigrants due process, which I thought was a GOOD thing. But...https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/1024734828342792192 …
-
-
No one wants open borders. You're just attacking a strawman. Abolishing ICE is about dismantling a rogue agency who consistently engages in human rights abuses. It's not saying we shouldn't have any immigration law enforcement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Abolish ICE as we know it because it's too far gone to be reformable. Start from scratch with a newly defined mission and organizational structure that will not so readily trammel human rights. That does not mean open borders.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or the immigration courts under Sessions are not giving the due process they purport to (e.g. report about judge he removed and replaced). Not wanting to be complicit in current show immigration courts ≠ open boarders or no actual due process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.