Or, perhaps the underlying reason why he didn’t get the votes shows better what kind of person he is.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those smears known as 'quoting his literal words'.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you can get "smeared" with your own racism, it might not be smearing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Showing your bias. David. Making public the prior writings of a nominee is not a "smear", it's called the "truth".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't have a strong opinion on him but I don't see why it's a noble sacrifice to skip the humiliation of losing a confirmation vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
is this a serious tweet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what he actually wrote was so tame...it was like a George Will column from 1990.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Let me guess you didn’t actually read the stuff he wrote did you? If you did and you think he was just debating affirmative action, you might wana take a good hard look at yourself, just saying
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for this example of another way that white men losing gets twisted into 'honor' and 'sacrifice.'
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So, exposing the truth about a person is now considered a hit job? Is that "Trumpspeak" or just your own form of deflecting?
-
His head is up (Trumps alternate reality).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Calling a racist a racist is not a hit job or a smear. There are enough white supremacists in government institutions - no need to add more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Quoting racists with their own racist words is a “smear”? Get a grip, man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
his writings shows what kind of person he is, and that kind of person should NEVER be allowed to be a federal judge
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol, all the left has to do is even slightly suggest someone might have said something "problematic" decades ago and their obedient clergy will sprint to Twitter to hold a mass struggle session and signal their virtue until they can type no more.
-
Ah, well known obedient clergyman of the left, Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC).
-
Responding to the commentors, not Scott himself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.