Amen. And it also provides an opportunity to delve into the finalists and educate.
-
-
-
If your not educated yet, open up a hot dog truck in Midtown.
-
Just now, Judge Hartiman being given a second look. So not a done deal. Why not educate the public and discuss the candidates?
-
Why not discuss the potential civilization on a planet in the Andromeda Galaxy? Because all discussion are meaningless in either case. The Senate will confirm or not irrespective of external oinions, and the distant civilization is equally oblivious to us. You need a cheesburger
-
Then why discuss anything? That is an odd view of the world . Nothing matters so why discuss anything. It will be what it will be. Okay.
-
I dont know about you but I always saved my argumentative discussions for the trier of FACT.
-
I agree. But here who is the trier of fact? The Senate, right? Why not give them facts? They have not IMO demonstrated much sleuthing of their own for years.
-
And you think they wil change now? The Senate Majority Leader was elected during the McKinley Administration and some of his colleagues rival Methuseah in longevity. A leapiard never changes its spots. What I warned people about Trump, but:pic.twitter.com/sRRf25FgNm
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Best pace for specuation is the Bellagio. "Wil I roll a 7"? Or you can go to the sports book and pick your candidate for $100. Since this process has become as inserious as the rest of governance, might as well gamble your earings away
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Barrett makes so much sense. She’s smart. Attractive. Diverse background. Female. Puts YUGE pressure on Donnelly a red state dem up for election. Helps gender gap in midterms. And if she’s voted down the base turn out in droves for midterms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.