Here’s a hot take: why does being smart matter for the Supreme Court? It can’t be overturned. Justices are mostly just deciding what seems “right”, and then blathering on to add some notion that it’s not just their feelings. So why not just ask nominees: how do you feel about X?
-
-
-
You should check out the views of one Richard A. Posner - you’d find a lot to like!
-
Given that Posner commented on basically every issue of relevance to lawyer I should probably make it my practice to first check out whether he’s already made the same point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What an awful comparison. Barrett wouldn't be my choice -- not a shock -- but to compare her to Palin would be like comparing Obama to OJ.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@POTUS is throwing names out there like chum and watching how the sharks react...the studious Presidential pick is Kethledge or Kavanugh...so that means Trump picks Barrett or Tharpar because of the added political benefits...no lose pick if all 4 are equal as “jurists”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great pick to further the movement toward a Christian theocracy in the US.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The most unimaginably idiotic reason conceivable (and it takes some effort to convince) for ACB not to get the nomination is Sarah Palin.
-
*conceive
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.