“Interesting” is your only comment on this? Do you have a view on whether it’s appropriate for a Judge to attempt to control who is nominated as his replacement in this way?
-
-
I like it! The rest of that paragraph makes clear that it applies to things other than the judge's own case work, by proscribing using the prestige of the office to help friends in other proceedings, or voluntarily serving as a character witness
-
-
The comment on that section includes an explicit reference to involvement in judicial selection, although presumably they didn't mean for one's own replacement. And his communications may not have fit within that safe harbor, if he did more than "respond to official inquiries"pic.twitter.com/o8XGZ4V3AZ
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.