By that logic he should have his appendix, tonsils and adenoids removed at birth.
-
-
-
You say that but cutters are so rabid they'll probably suggest it. Actually, they have. The tonsil scare in the 80s and 90s had doctors routinely removing tonsils from children for unrelated diseases. And they probably don't even know the real purpose of the appendix
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
David, we need a CIRCUMCISION BAN, PUNISHMENT FOR THE PERPETRATORS, and MASSIVE government funding for tissue regeneration to regenerate our foreskins and make our bodies whole again! Watch my channel trailer in my Twitter bio where I explain how we might make this happen!!!
-
Appreciation for your courage
@Gregory_Malchuk!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually, circumcision is not an effective way to protect anyone from STD’s. There are studies showing higher rates of STD and especially Gonorrhea for circumcised men. It’s known the cut men spread STI’s at higher rates than intact men. Condoms not cutting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if I said I circumcised my daughter because it prevents
#HIV? Would invoking a feigned interest in public health make me less of a jerk? Trivia: US researchers found a lower incidence of HIV in women who were#FGM. No “mass campaigns” for it tho.#i2 http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2017/08/does-female-genital-mutilation-have-health-benefits-the-problem-with-medicalizing-morality/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We discussed this on Episode 5 of our podcast Reasonable Buzzkill
@reasonablebuzz1. I agree with you.https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/reasonablebuzzkills-podcast/id1436043471?mt=2&i=1000421354825 … - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
https://www.hindawi.com/archive/2013/109846/ … "Langerhans cells are the first line of mucosal defense. Their presence in the mucosal portion of the prepuce may explain why the overall incidence and prevalence of STIs is lower in intact men." Claims of STD prevention are lies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Omg. That is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard
-
Cutting a newborn to prevent STDs?
-
Impossible. A newborn is incapable of performing sex acts, which makes it sound more like kiddy-diddling than a legitimate concern. The pedoes must be afraid of that kid's rash, but they're probably psychotic anyways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
His claim about STD reduction is incorrect. Circumcision is just child abuse.
-
It is when done routinely to youngsters who can't chose for themselves
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Honestly the STD claim is based on questionable science, those who back female circumcision make the same claim, that it protects against STDs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#ShitProCuttersSay There is no "medical necessity" to ritual genital mutilation. You are spreading pro-cutting propaganda.#i2 -
That's exactly what he said. Are Jews going to stop practicing brit milah and claim medical disorders in their sons' penises after circumcision is banned? No, probably not.
-
No, he said he supports *some* ritual genital mutilation.
#i2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you, David G. McAfee, for raising awareness to this severe issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Circumcision is about as medically necessary as removing earlobes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.