This is a fascinating comment in the Economist. It seems obviously wrong, and (they claim) an opinion held by an entire profession. A carbon tax seems like a very good way of partially solving the problem...pic.twitter.com/41WyHKuIjZ
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
That seems likely. Though for both the ozone hole and Clean Air Act I was surprised at how much a relatively small number of ideas proved to be key. I'm not sure they're the ones I would have advocated for at the time, either, which is personally sobering(!)
Me too. Point taken. Nevertheless, massive interventions are risky. And increasing taxes increases our vulnerability to the next emergency. Are we going to meet them *all* by increasing taxes further?
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.