are you alluding to everett as a "loophole" to avoid nonlocality?
Non-locality in physics is a myth. Violating Bell's inequalities does not make a theory non-local:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/1/87/htm …
-
-
-
These are theorems. They don't use, or have, loopholes. But yes, this is one of several reasons why quantum theory just is 'Everettian quantum theory'.
-
Would you say, per David Wallace, QM doesn’t have a measurement problem, given “QM” == Everett?
-
Thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Their theorem applies to a vast range of possible theories that violate Bell's inequalities by more than quantum theory does. Also, startlingly, it applies to ALL theories that forbid superluminal signalling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“All politics is local” Too bad politics has infected physics
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Inspired by this, I took a 2nd shot at understanding "Info Flow in Entangled Quantum Systems" https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9906007.pdf … But...the Heisenberg picture has me stumped. Anyone know of a video that gives a visually intuitive explanation of it?
@Crit_Rat@dela3499@MatjazLeonardispic.twitter.com/8JJJ7wOhGc
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
David, does long-distance quantum non-local interaction lead you to give consideration to panphyscism type theories?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.