That is not the one (although a cool article). They semi-doxxed a scientist potentially at the heart of the Wuhan virus. They doxed him with publicly available info, I hasten to add.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
that wasn't the article "according to sources at BuzzFeed"https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/a-pro-trump-blog-has-doxed-a-chinese-scientist-it-falsely …
-
"Pro-Trump blog"...
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
And so they should be booted? Do you know how many really prominent finance guys actually knowingly publish there? Apparently not. If spamming is a problem, CNN should have been banned a decade ago.
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
not a peer reviewed paper and also this:https://twitter.com/trvrb/status/1223337991168380928 …
-
None of these papers are peer reviewed (nor is peer review a magic elixir). This epidemic is not gonna wait for peer reviewing.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Dave: what this article indicates to me is the possibility of biological warfare; China doesn't care about its own population and likely considered it an easy way to warn the West from any measures that they deem negative for their regime stability.
-
That has been openly discussed.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Let’s be super clear. This is conspiracy theory material you are spreading. Would you spread antivax nonsense? Because I’m not seeing a huge difference.
-
Let's be super clear. People conspire. There is a huge difference.
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.