I read it yesterday, before seeing anyone else's take, and thought it was horrendous. You assured people that the odds of surviving a nuclear attack are "overwhelming" because such an attack would never affect "the suburbs and countryside." And I know you don't live in a city.
-
-
-
Point 1 of your piece had nothing to do with preparedness. It says "not to worry, because mainly cities and their residents will get vaporized." To ignore the political implications of this is either dense or disingenuous.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You have to just feel sorry for her At this point she's just like Joy Behar
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She did something similar to me last year. Really awful stuff, so I'm right there with you:https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2017/07/25/msnbcs-joy-reid-says-im-ugly-hate-jesus-and-represent-foulest …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What she said reveals a lot about herself...IMO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You literally said not to worry so much if there’s a nuclear war because it will only kill people in cities. That’s the whole message of your article.
-
Reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit.
-
Odds are you WON’T die, so prepare to live. How hard was that to understand, Kit?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe you should take a step back and read your work? I don’t think their interpretation is really all that outlandish, given the words you wrote. It’s a pretty clear implication of what you said.
-
Do you even know anything about David French? Maybe you should do some research so you'll know why it's just preposterous to smear him that way.
-
When they say dumb things like this it just heightens one of the most common criticisms of the GOP: Democrats are the party of the inner city and the left and right coasts. Nothing more. Not something a national party should boast about.
-
I can tell you didnt read the article or my bio. I won't carry a discussion with you any further. It's obvious you're too partisan to take an honest look.
-
Pray tell what you thought I was responding to? It's clear you attack without considering context. You think you're terribly clever. Sadly, you're not. I was defending French.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
that's how the media works now days, no proof needed for anything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JoyAnnReid is to my side as Hannity is to yours, myopic and without credibility. -
except she's a racist, Hannity is not.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.