At the same time, while we don't have all the facts, redacted documents do raise concerns about an unlawful "side deal" with the prosecution. We need to get to find out the truth, and if there was an unlawful "side deal," then Flynn's entitled to judicial relief. /2
-
-
Show this thread
-
Finally, the case raises an issue that applies not just to Flynn. Should the law permit prosecutions for lying to the FBI when 1) the FBI knows the truth; and 2) obtaining the lie was the purpose of the interrogation? /end
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the case was so strong against him, why did they need the perjury trap?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, he did. Once Trump was elected, he got Trump to ask the DOJ to look into deporting Gulen. And the DOJ/Sessions ignored it, as they should have.
End of conversation
-
-
-
But the Turkey allegations were not the basis for the FBI interview. He may have violated FARA, but it was a supposed violation of the Logan Act that brought the FBI to the White House, where they got him to do...something. At this point, I can't follow the threads.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Telling the truth was always an option
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.