FYI. Without "angry movements", we wouldn't have had: Women's rights Civil Rights An end to the Vietnam War The end of slavery The labor movement Environmental protections And the original "angry movement" -- The Revolutionary War Maybe step back and realize how change is made.
If these polarized times are radicalizing me around anything, they're radicalizing me around the Bill of Rights. Angry governments are vindictive governments. Angry movements are vindictive movements. Individual liberty is fragile always, but especially in times like these.
-
-
-
That's fine. The intent isnt to eliminate these movements, its to keep them from carrying out revenge later. I'm actually with French on this one
-
Revenge? What do you have in mind? What past examples, or what current prospects?
-
What i mean is reverse the persecution. Like French Revolution where beheading and chaos happened, Bolsheviks seizing assets, there's all kinds of examples post civil strife. Those are extreme examples, but its natural to want revenge
-
Okay. But I don’t even know whose revenge against whom is being intimated here.
-
No one's. I think the point is this shit can go somewhere bad, and the general population needs to be vigilant about adhering to those principles
-
Agreed!
Конец переписки
Новая переписка -
-
-
Irrelevant Frenchie tries to act like a Bill of Rights supporter after working for Cankles. What a joke.
- еще 1 ответ
Новая переписка -
-
-
You’re disrespect for the 14th Amendment is noted and noticed, but probably not by the people who care to talk to.
-
“Your.” My auto-fill is not an exact match for my feelings.
Конец переписки
Новая переписка -
-
-
I would prefer nonviolent and disciplined activists as in Women's March, climate marches, civil rights past. Online, I prefer civility. I can see, politically, direct action could backfire. Yet GOP aligned groups menacingly carry weapons at events. Online, they swarm people
Конец переписки
Новая переписка -
-
-
Trump wants to set boundaries for where ppl can protest and make them pay to be on public property. I assume Kavanaugh wld be just fine with that. unless they were keggers
- еще 1 ответ
Новая переписка -
-
-
An open government is mandatory to protecting our civil rights. When law enforcement agencies deny records request, we all lose. Demand access to record!!!
Спасибо. Твиттер использует эту информацию, чтобы сделать вашу ленту лучше. ОтменитьОтменить
-
-
-
Then you must speak out more about voting rights, the freedom of the press, the separation of church and state, the difference btwn the right to bear arms and the responsibility to bear them, and most importantly, the absence of due process for victims in police shootings.
- еще 1 ответ
Новая переписка -
-
-
Chants "lock her up" about an opponent Praise for leaders who murder their critics Encouraging physical violence against those who disagree and promising to pay the legal fee Locks children in cagesYou are correct. Angry governments are vindictive and dangerous.
#VoteThemOut - еще 1 ответ
Новая переписка -
Загрузка может занять некоторое время.
Вероятно, серверы Твиттера перегружены или в их работе произошел кратковременный сбой. Повторите попытку или посетите страницу Статус Твиттера, чтобы узнать более подробную информацию.