-
-
Replying to @Viss
wait... 101% now I'm just guessing here, but I don't think those add up.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SteveD3
well its googles tool, so you can blame them ;bhttps://datagifmaker.withgoogle.com/editor/circles#
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
The actual data could have been, for example: 7.6%, 26.6%, 14.6%, 51.2% Their sum is 100.0, but not if you round-to-nearest first. Makes me wonder what the best way to avoid this would be...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @David3141593 @Viss
don't work too hard on this, I was joking, since the metrics listed bad jokes as a response.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Of course, but it doesn't take much to nerd snipe me 
1:55 PM - 8 May 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.