Why is this one so much smaller than the first?
-
-
Replying to @David3141593
Hi David, it is smaller because we think that it is a lot less challenging than the first bounty. Secondly, this bounty is intended to help us identify a potential security weakness.
3 replies 3 retweets 2 likes -
So if the previous bounty was "unhackable", and this one is less challenging, have you decided to drop the "unhackable" advertising?
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @David3141593
David, the first bounty simulates situation where user has device stolen. The second bounty simulates situation where user has device taken from him (without his knowledge), modified, then returned & continues to work normally while giving the attacker the users phrase or keys
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes, I am aware of that. My question still stands.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @David3141593
If our second bounty leads to discovery that this situation is possible, we will fix it. If we cannot fix it, we would then say that it’s unhackable only in certain conditions, such as, that the device never leaves your possession and you keep it in secure place.
5 replies 1 retweet 1 like
I can assure you, the second bounty won't last a week
If it can't ever leave my possession or be left in an insecure place, why don't I just write my keys on a piece of paper?
It would be disingenuous to market a piece of paper in a safe as "unhackable in certain conditions"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.