Wait wait: int* p and int *p are the asme thing?
-
-
Replying to @DaveVoyles
@DaveVoyles Welcome to the wonderful world of Pointer!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElementCy
@ElementCy@DaveVoyles They aren't the same. "int *p" is correct. The other should get you punched. :P2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Chounard
@Chounard@elementcy@MachXGames This is horrible. Pointers are a terrible concept4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveVoyles
@DaveVoyles@Chounard@MachXGames Pointers are awesome! Don't need to copy data, just have a ref to it!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElementCy
@ElementCy@DaveVoyles@Chounard@MachXGames They both parse to associate * with the p. If you do "int* A, B" only A will be a pointer.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Rabbit42
@ElementCy@DaveVoyles@Chounard@MachXGames Writing "int *a, b" is just clearer notation. And yes, pointers are a beautiful thing.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Rabbit42
@The_Rabbit42 Wait, why put "*int" if you already have "*a, b*" to show that they are pointers?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveVoyles
@DaveVoyles You wouldn't do *int... Did you see the quotation mark before the "int" as an asterisk?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@The_Rabbit42 Oh ok, I misread it. Damn small font!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.