I didn't realize that AMD was struggling: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/13/us-amd-jpmorgan-idUSBRE8AC14Z20121113 …
-
-
Replying to @bill_at_zeboyd
@bill_at_zeboyd Which is scary. Because then Intel's competition is......?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveVoyles
@DaveVoyles I know. That's why I was surprised. I thought maaaaaaaybe #2 in the market was doing at least decently. But I'd be wrong then.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bill_at_zeboyd
@bill_at_zeboyd I always use AMD chips in my desktop (so affordable!)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveVoyles
@DaveVoyles I install whatever currently has the best bang-buck. AMD's been lagging, so has ATI (owned by AMD).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bill_at_zeboyd
@bill_at_zeboyd Then again, I haven't updated my CPU in 2 years, so that explains that :P1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveVoyles
@DaveVoyles AMD's best bang/buck chip from previous years IMO was the Athlon II X3. Today? Not sure what competes well w/ Corei5s.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bill_at_zeboyd
@bill_at_zeboyd I've been using the Phenom 3 for a while, but nothing has come close since Intel brought out the i(x) line of chips1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveVoyles
@DaveVoyles Maybe that's what I meant, Phenom II X3. The 3 core one which is the 4-core one but w/ a core disabled. Good bang/buck.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bill_at_zeboyd Yes. that was exactly it. That's what I've been using
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.