“We do not work with Mr. Larsen,” a police department spokesman wrote in an email. “That party has the discretion whether or not to release footage to SFPD.” Bullshit. The article repeatedly cites video from the network being provided to police, and cops can subpoena any time.
-
-
Yep, SFPD lied to
@NellieBowles, knowing full well they were viewing live video feeds. "SFPD received real-time live access to hundreds of cameras as well as a "data dump" of camera footage amid the ongoing demonstrations against police violence." https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/san-francisco-police-accessed-business-district-camera-network-spy-protestors …Show this thread -
And, again,
@chrislarsensf is lying about all of the "surveillance state without the state" bullshit. His video network is about side-stepping public debate and regulations, not operating without police involvement. Why@NellieBowles bought into that BS is baffling.Show this thread -
It's not just SFPD illegally accessing the camera network's live feeds, but Homeland Security, too. Of course, Chris "without the state" Larsen is cool with that. He knew full well what he was building and deliberately deceived the public about it.https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/sf-police-under-fire-for-watching-protests-live-on-security-cameras/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
