I have a brain-pending unarticle that argues designers should take more interest in speculative future things. But this puts it well.https://twitter.com/designoutloud/status/873320549421678593 …
-
-
Replying to @Cennydd
@designoutloud I took a stab at how to think about those things, but I think reality obviated some points.http://uxmag.com/articles/designing-down-from-science-fiction-a-staged-approach …1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ddt @designoutloud
Thanks! Looking forward to checking it out, probably during a rain delay at tomorrow's cricket :)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
We designers don't yet think big or deeply enough about what preferred situations could be.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I find it is an interesting balance to strike between a future that's ambitious and one a client feels capable of achieving.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
How do you feel when a designer comes to you with "here’s a solution, here’s the 'if we had magic' solution, too"? Or job applicants?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
"If we had magic" is supposed to free your thinking, but I prefer when people are able to reframe a problem from a new perspective.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveHogue @docbaty and
That’s a good point. I don’t see them as exclusive, but lenses you can combine if you’re aware.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ddt @DaveHogue and
It's a useful way to challenge constraints, by ignoring them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Not saying "magical thinking" can't be good as an exercise, but I think it's harder to reframe a problem in a new way than to play magic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.