Hypothetical question: if you were to subscribe to Facebook ($24-36 / yr), what would you expect in return? Fewer ads? Premium features?
@summervillain @atomick "privacy" (no data) and how FB works are in conflict - the service relies on knowing stuff about you...
-
-
true, so the price point you suggested may be low. but if I were to pay, that's what I'd pay for.
-
+1. Privacy will be the hottest commodity for those who want to stay connected. Poor+tracked vs rich+invisible.
-
Ironically, the poor will be tracked for the purpose of retail targeting at those who have the least to spend...
-
Bingo. That’s how to keep them on the aspirational treadmill of desperation.
-
.
@atomick@DaveHogue relevant legislation pending http://ow.ly/niVk309I1Ky (& pcworld may autoplay video overlay which ALSO seems relevant)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
that's right. I would pay to use the service & be invisible to their extended monetization strategy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.