@davegray I believe you can design “for” experience. Subtle but IMHO important difference
-
-
Replying to @jeffsussna
@jeffsussna I suspect@cwodtke would agree and the difference has to do with the inherent vagueness of language. But I could be wrong1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davegray
@davegray@jeffsussna I find the argument tiresome. :D1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cwodtke
@cwodtke@davegray@jeffsussna why don't we argue about what fundamentals of OD that UX'ers working in change projects should know about
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @cwodtke
@cwodtke “organizational design”@movito@davegray@jeffsussna1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DaveHogue
@DaveHogue I concur@daveixd@cwodtke@movito@jeffsussna1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davegray
@davegray OxD it is then.@DaveHogue@cwodtke@movito@jeffsussna3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @daveixd
@daveixd can we call it organization creative design so it can be OCD?@davegray@DaveHogue@movito@jeffsussna1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.