@DaveHogue I might use that, but replace simple with clear.
-
-
Replying to @designoutloud
@designoutloud I like clear, too, but it's a bit ambiguous - clear can mean a few things, but simple means simple.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveHogue
@DaveHogue exactly. the reach of clear is greater and is desired even when simple isn't possible. Or wanted, as is sometimes the case.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @designoutloud
@designoutloud I had an advisor in college who spoke passionately about "elegant research design", and I want to capture his usage.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveHogue
@DaveHogue I agree strongly with elegance. The moment a UI starts to become beautiful in its function and form is among my favorites.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @designoutloud
@designoutloud@DaveHogue This is crazy talk. In the face of company politics, someone will just make it look pretty & call it elegant2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hpdailyrant
@hpdailyrant@designoutloud which is why I wanted to define elegant in terms that explicitly exclude "pretty" - this is not a red carpet...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DaveHogue
@DaveHogue@hpdailyrant yes. I mean beauty in the RB Fuller sense. Pretty is highly contextual.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @designoutloud
@designoutloud@hpdailyrant Ugh. I just want a word that means one thing. JUST ONE THING. ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveHogue
@DaveHogue@hpdailyrant You don't ask for much, do ya?pic.twitter.com/y5H0Xz6lLT1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@designoutloud @hpdailyrant But I think I'm the one getting beat up on this one... LOL
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.