Thinking. Talked with @gregtarnoff about accessibility & animations http://rachelnabors.com/2015/08/02/vestibular-disorders-ui-animation/ … Now reading about lighting http://d-pi.tumblr.com/post/125910524056/could-you-explain-how-to-do-lighting-in …
-
-
Replying to @rachelnabors
I wonder what a UI without any motion at all but relying on animated lighting effects (contrast + values to guide the eye) would look like.
3 replies 5 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @rachelnabors
That would really be "cinematic UI." Theoretically, it would be more accessible than motion-based UI. Ostensibly. Maybe. HRRRMMMM…
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rachelnabors
(Also, this is why I try not to use "motion" interchangeably with "animation." Animation is change. Not all change is spatial ;)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rachelnabors
@rachelnabors love this idea, but I wonder how we would handle info density if we don't move layers in and out. Reveal / conceal w/ light?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveHogue
@davehogue Yes, like staging. And also, consider keying values up and down to increase + decrease contrast.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rachelnabors
@davehogue A menu could literally disappear into the background when you don't need it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rachelnabors
@rachelnabors wouldn't that be perceived as opacity changes? Fade in, fade out? Not like a lenticular lens.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveHogue
@davehogue Not necessarily. See the second link in my first tweet. Reducing saturation, increasing contrast, opacity is ham-fisted in comp.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rachelnabors need to read that when I can see the images. Low bandwidth on phone on the bus...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.