Any specific examples? I haven’t seen any egregious errors
-
-
-
How about the articles and interviews about the "disenfranchised white rural poor people" who are frustrated and therefore voted for the fucktwit without ever mentioning the overt racism?
-
I have seen different opinions on that. I have also talked to some middle Americans who feel resentful for being labeled racist (even if they are supporting racist immigration laws). The ignorance can be unintentional rather than malicious in intent, even if harmful in effect
-
Overall I think it’s an attempt to get a realistic handle on “the Trump effect” and see how we can address their concerns. Middle America was pretty much neglected in Democrats’ 2016 platform. Hillary skipped rust belt states when campaigning
-
I just perceive what seems to be far too much false equivalency in their coverage. Not all perspectives and opinions are equal, and terrible opinions are not equal to actual facts, yet they give time and voice to them.
-
New conversation -
-
-
I think they're trying to walk a line between objective news reporting and not pissing off conservative subscribers/advertisers; I don't think that line exists.
-
Agreed. The truth isn't about balancing people's feelings, and it's not the truth if the story is modified for revenue...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.