I'm no logo designer, but I welcome your thoughts:https://dribbble.com/shots/4635964
-
-
Replying to @PaulAnnett
Such a clever idea. The length works against you a bit and the P is hard to pull off. If I was at my desk, I'd try it not as all caps but rather as lower case plus a single thin line. Might be too much but fun exploring
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @scottjenson
Thanks Scott. Do you mean a single thin line outlining the shape of the letter? I'm not sure that it's currently any specific case, just whatever worked per letter for the geometry – the T looks uppercase, the u looks lowercase.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulAnnett
Needs some exploring. I was thinking a thin line would call out the p and t more. Probably not needed for the others. Putting the c o and p 'circles' all on the same center line would help calm the flow down. But you'd then need something to help them pop a bit: hence the line
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scottjenson @PaulAnnett
OK, finally got home. Here are two ideas.pic.twitter.com/km0QCIqJAA
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scottjenson
Thank you! My T was originally like yours but I feel it breaks the simplicity of the shapes. Without the clear letterforms the original is more abstract. The op circles at different levels remind me of musical notes. Does it need to be readable? I'll have a bit more of a play…
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I don't think it needs to be readable, but I do think it needs to be further distilled. It's not necessary to have one symbol per letter in the actual spelling. What is the essence of name? How might that be captured abstractly? Could "octo" be "8" instead?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.