Big diff here between implementer effect= facilitator qual vs scale up has diff effects because diff intensity or diff components.
3 examples where scaling up a successful development pilot failed when it involved changing the implementerhttps://davidevans.blog/2017/04/17/why-scaling-up-fails/ …
-
-
-
Fair point. There are a range of effects that come w scale up. Not all due to change in implementer
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bold et al eg govt "contract" teachers were not paid and then made permanent. Ie they implemented entirely diff program. Is that imp effect?
-
Setting aside attrition issue (for a moment), it might be an implementer effect if differences driven by diffs in implementer
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Given that implementer matters at least as much as mechanism, sounds like we should focus a lot more on evaluations of gov't implementation!
-
From what's here, it is the mechanism--knowledge & intensity of the intervention. What I suspect happens is intensity is reduced in scale up
-
A good point, depends on what your goal is. If goal is shortest path to scale up, evaluating with your at-scale implementer is simplest.
-
But if goal is understanding WHY, then you need to unpack specifically how gov't implementation differs from NGO implementation.
-
NGOs have publication-concerned researchers watching them like hawks?
-
More room to maneuver and different incentives, when budget is from & accountability is to donors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.