They don’t even fall under the ACA because of their designation regardless of how many hours we worked. They get around it by saying they’re a tech company that builds software not a delivery company. If we just had a sustainable job market this wouldn’t be an issue.
-
-
Replying to @DaryRezvani @centralcoastn83
Like yea it would be lit if I could do that for all my employees and not have to pay any taxes on them either but that’s how we pay for unemployment etc...
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @centralcoastn83
Yea I mean that’s the whole thing is that if we had a sustainable job market and it was actually “supplemental” I could get behind it. The only reason we even use that excuse is because it’s how Lyft and Uber framed it from the beginning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaryRezvani @centralcoastn83
To me this is just different way of framing that you shouldn’t be able to live off of minimum wage, which was in fact it’s intention.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @centralcoastn83
O I know, I’m saying it’s just another symptom of boomers screwing us. Coulda just tied it to growth and we would be in a completely different situation. Change is coming...I think.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @centralcoastn83
The polling of drivers had it supported by almost 80%. Lyft and Uber have dropped $200 million on it so it’s def gunna be a battle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Yea I mean threats from industry aren’t a reason not to move forward on good legislation. The government is the referee, they shouldn’t change a call because LeBron got mad.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.