Or better framed: is the money better spent putting people in cages or helping communities to thrive.
I guess the argument is, do you think the money is better spent attempting to regulate existing crime or investing to prevent future crime.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Speaking generally, you need both. Ultimately the goal should be to reduce crime in the future by preventative measures aimed at root causes while still regulating current crime. How these two are funded depends on the needs of the city.
-
In most cases, it probably makes more sense to put more money towards preventative measures. In terms of "regulating" current crime, that can mean a lot of things, not just traditional policing.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.