In fact exactly wrong, energy R&D hugely important but take 30years to reach 1% penetration, look to deploymenthttps://twitter.com/DanielleFong/status/671187501806133248 …
-
-
Replying to @JigarShahDC
@JigarShahDC I highly doubt they are being manipulated; bill gates put out very cogent reasons for why an energy miracle was needed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
Manipulated in that none of them understand the industries they hope to disrupt, their advisors owned by existing players
@DanielleFong8 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JigarShahDC
@JigarShahDC Both Bill and I recognize the unnatural pace of energy invention scale up we're asking for. You seem to think it is too hard...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
As I said, I wish you every personal success, but not Bill's warped point of view on existing tech
@DanielleFong4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JigarShahDC
@JigarShahDC@DanielleFong t's good enough, and we'll improve on the fly. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sustainable2050
@Sustainable2050@JigarShahDC agree that we can't wait but still think we will need breakthroughs to future pass limits to scale and economy1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
Yes tech innovation has been crucial to scale up of
#wind and#solar but it happened b/c of deployment fwd@DanielleFong@Sustainable20506 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@JigarShahDC @Sustainable2050 i'm definitely a fan of continual improvement through deployment. but r&d steps behind that critical too
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.