In fact exactly wrong, energy R&D hugely important but take 30years to reach 1% penetration, look to deploymenthttps://twitter.com/DanielleFong/status/671187501806133248 …
-
-
Replying to @JigarShahDC
@JigarShahDC I highly doubt they are being manipulated; bill gates put out very cogent reasons for why an energy miracle was needed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
Manipulated in that none of them understand the industries they hope to disrupt, their advisors owned by existing players
@DanielleFong8 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JigarShahDC
@JigarShahDC Where I get hung up is: how are we supposed to reach the emissions reductions required without a similar scale up in some tech?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
We have seen tremendous advances in tech on solar, wind, lithium-ion, etc b/c of deployment not R&D promises, big distinction
@DanielleFong5 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
@JigarShahDC totally agree that deployment learning curve scale up have been critical -- accounting for the majority of cost declines.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.