-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong Hard to pwn someone by citing the discredited IPCC.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong Sorry, it's hard to point out how discredited the IPCC is in 140 characters. But it is, to anyone who understands science.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
@DanielleFong And I've always counted Jerry Brown as someone who doesn't understand science.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
@DanielleFong And I would add that I greatly admire you, and would never condescend to you with a term like "darling."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
@Rand_Simberg but the measure of models with significant anthropogenic climatological effects is much greater than that which show no effect2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong I would say that I find your worship of models (that have failed to conform with empirical evidence) very disturbing. ;-)7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rand_Simberg
@Rand_Simberg worship is a little much. The models are off as they always are. The question is how well they shall guide our course1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong And my answer is, given their performance to date, and the politics driving them, at this point, zero. But read Judy Curry.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Rand_Simberg will do. I'll readily admit that our collective compass is imperfect, even downright biased but it's no excuse to stop looking
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong
@DanielleFong Thank you, darlin'. That is not a term of condescension, just the way old folks like me talk to smart young wimmen folk. ;-)0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.