Court rules that cleaning big oil spill is uninsured because damage to building merely probable, not inevitable. Implication: wait and see
-
-
@johnbuckoke we took them to court since it clearly covers damage to the building; after four years of delays, court sides with defendant2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
@johnbuckoke they argued that since the damage wasn't certain, the principle of impending peril doesn't apply.Note the similarity to climate1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
"Damages sustained due to the voluntary act of insured to avoid a named peril are not a consequence of that peril and are not recoverable"
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
In this case it is NS law to respond, so it is arguable that we were compelled to respond. But on the main, it is just absurd...
1:39 PM - 23 Dec 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.