Court rules that cleaning big oil spill is uninsured because damage to building merely probable, not inevitable. Implication: wait and see
@johnbuckoke they argued that since the damage wasn't certain, the principle of impending peril doesn't apply.Note the similarity to climate
-
-
"Damages sustained due to the voluntary act of insured to avoid a named peril are not a consequence of that peril and are not recoverable"
-
In this case it is NS law to respond, so it is arguable that we were compelled to respond. But on the main, it is just absurd...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.