as much as people talk about putting music on the blockchain i cannot see the fundamental protocol working if it adds too many milliseconds to the latency. the liveness and quickness of music is key; the blockchains expensive and slow
-
Show this thread
-
if music is just about recording ownership then okay, but i mean it really isn’t!
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @DanielleFong
I dream of super low latency. I find live ad-hoc performances (aka jamming) truly wonderful. Imagine getting the latency down to where you could hook up with folks over the net and jam live together.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @scampbellnet
i’ve been boggling against this for some time; it’s doable, and there may be some active delay compensation and smart mixing to do, and ping matters, nyc to sydney is a long long way, but it’s feasible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong
Even using my linux machine (rt kern) as a real time sound processor adds detectable latency. Around .05ms is daunting. Then again, quantum entanglement may not have latency :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @scampbellnet
in my opinion 5ms is great and 10ms acceptable, more is bad
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanielleFong
I work hard to keep it low. Mostly playing guitar, tactile feedback highlights sound delay. Much less so with a synth. Still, 10ms is a tough cookie over our current media. I can't imagine any sort of delay tactic that could help with live. But don't let me stop you! GO!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

