when adding together multiple lines of converging evidence, the uncertainties don't add, exactly, in many ways, they partially cancel each other out, over constraining some of the possibility space, rendering it impossible.
actually for me and my family 80 million was our estimate too. it comes out a naive application of the numbers, as they were then, among other calculations. "registered cause of deaths" is at 5 MM. at near within an order of magnitude it's not bad I think, but;
-
-
the landscape of mutation was always going to drive this thing, and how do you estimate that? also, people *can* modify it in the lab, now that it's out, do you think people *won't?* they already have! it could leak. and any mixture could yield recombination.
-
I would say there is more cause for concern regarding the huge societal mindset shifting from being anti-Big Pharma to outrageously lauding the inability for anything except perfection even when regarding a nobody online discussing, amiccably, related context.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right. So, the issue (and I'll use Canada as the example first) is that 95% during the first wave of OG was over the age of 65 years; the distinction of those who are affected long-term hasn't altered after 3 years Age bracket 65-74 maintain more than all preceding ages combined
-
the latter was American. With 56% of the deaths being over the age of 74 (75+) if you're to look at the associated commorbities, you'd see that alzheimers, influenza and pneumonia are listed very high
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
