people who say “this only solves 1-10% of the problem, so it doesn’t solve the problem, so it’s a distraction” fail to appreciate that sometimes you have to do *many things* to solve a problem ex. climate change. there are a lot of people who think Nukes are The answer not only
-
-
There's also the temporal aspect: We need to scale up the solutions before new nukes would be able to make much of a difference. In the meantime they'd suck up a vast amount of capital to the detriment of getting those other solutions deployed.
-
solar is 100x more widespread than wind, so it’s really this plus bulk storage of some kind that is the straightest shot we’ve got
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
a lot of people see things as they are and not as the sum of their components
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
