there’s a lot of ways for bias to make this go wrong when measured that way, eg older people more likely to be vaxxed first. that why you do randomized controlled trials…
-
-
Clearly, this is one way the data could be skewed, but it seems like a lesser skew than assuming 100% of the other party had severe COVID and that is the level of protection. Or using 2 years of un
Covid deaths vs 2 mo of
COVID deaths. -
Or saying that the vaccines are 99% effective at preventing breakthrough infections, because you stopped counting in May once people were vaccinated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

