While that 'sounds good' the fact that so many people, with the shots are still dying, is terrible. Pre covid, if that many people with a 'vaccine' were still dying, the 'vaccine' would have been considered a failure; BUT ITS COVID, so now people think such bad results are 'ok'.
but don’t you know what absolute risk reduction is? it’s always lower unless the whole population is exposed during the current period of the study
-
-
True but consider two scenarios with Two groups of 10K people. Scenario one: 162 cases in group with no shots and 8 cases with shots so 154 cases reduction. RRR is 95% (154 / 162). ARR is 1.54% ( 154 / 10,000), which does not sound as good as the RRR of 95%.
-
yeah it’s definitely worse marketing but it’s also objectively a less useful measure than the relative protection, unless you’re really just trying to highlight that this is a rare disease, which during this delta wave it most certainly is not
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If the comparison goes back to January it is cooked. Hardly anybody was vaccinated in the winter 20-21 spike, so they are juking the unvaccinated number by including them.
-
Yup. Which changes the percentage of vaccinated people dying of COVID from 10-15%, to closer to 30-40% conservatively. It should be tough to hide this data for much longer.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

