7.3% is a 'high level of protection'; for a vaccine? Since when? As a comparison, the WORLDWIDE case total for polio in 2020 was under 500. For the covid shots that is like a few hours.
-
-
Replying to @EvanWil41824796 @DavidBCollum
I'm not really sure I understand your point. If 7.3% of deaths were in fully vaccinated, then about 92.5% were in unvaccinated. Probably less protection as most in Austin weren't vaccinated until after March.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Pravduh15 @DavidBCollum
While that 'sounds good' the fact that so many people, with the shots are still dying, is terrible. Pre covid, if that many people with a 'vaccine' were still dying, the 'vaccine' would have been considered a failure; BUT ITS COVID, so now people think such bad results are 'ok'.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EvanWil41824796 @DavidBCollum
I agree. My main concern is that data isn't being reported accurately, so people are placing too much faith in the vaccines. They believe breakthrough infections are rare and that the vaccines prevent severe COVID and death.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
My point is that while these things might be true to a degree,we need to stress that breakthrough infections are common and sometimes they result in death or severe COVID. Definitely not a reason to mandate vaccines to stop transmission. Maybe a 25% reduction in deaths is good
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pravduh15 @DavidBCollum
Pre covid, NO ONE ever talked about 'break through infections' for a 'vaccine'. It either worked or not. Polio less than 500 cases WORLDWIDE last year, because that vaccine works; covid, not so well, but we call it a 'vaccine' and pretend it works like one so people feel better.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EvanWil41824796 @DavidBCollum
Sure, because no one killed anyone when the flu vaccine didn't really work, so it wasn't a big deal. (Some efficacy with the flu vaccine, but if it you still got/ spread the flu, who cares only 34K annual flu deaths.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
@DanielleFong it makes more sense, now, huh?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
afaict this is still quite an effective vaccine, but the virus is evolving, what you gonna do?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The reported 95% efficiency is Relative Risk Reduction. Absolute Risk Reduction is less than a percent. (page 3 table 1, upper left n values of 162 and 8 in a set of about 18K people) https://www.thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00069-0/attachment/bb4bb1cf-8d64-453f-a2b7-e1b95194c109/mmc1.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

