i don’t want to call them out by name but one rhymes with hassmussen
-
-
Can you point me to a paper by Angela Rasmussen that you find problematic?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
oh man, sorry don’t want to go there
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What conclusion do you think I’m going to draw from you refusing to back yourself up with any concrete details?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
at this point i’ve given up on trying to make you conclude anything. but go search twitter histories for “human to human transmission”, “airborne”, or “mutation”, if you wish, she’s honorable enough that she’s kept that all online afaik, unlike many others
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This is her talking about mutations back in January 2020. You suggested there was resistance to the idea that vaccines mutate. That didn’t include her.pic.twitter.com/dCm3NMQhnn
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
look i really don't want to pick on her because really she's one of the honest ones, she makes her positions clear and keeps her stuff up. i don't want to call individual people out or piss people off, & with what you're doing, don't want to drop more names but that's dated 2021?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sorry - my bad with the search function. Here’s one from February 2020 with her emphasising that RNA viruses have a high mutation rate. All I’m asking for is evidence because I genuinely think the accusation is overblown.pic.twitter.com/CfAFMoMrqi
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
probably the best thread to pull on if you really want to know about this is to look at the experience of Bette Korber at Los Alamos in tracking mutations; it was she who expressed she experienced extraordinary resistance to the idea that the virus would meaningfully mutate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’ve already said I find that a remarkable accusation. I’ve shown that someone you identify as problematic isn’t resistant to that idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
i give up, have fun “winning” arguments online
-
-
You: “epidemiologists have done badly” Me: “really? what’s your evidence” You:”A virologist got X wrong” Me: “virologist ≠ epidemiologist, but here she is getting X not wrong” You: I give up have fun winning arguments online Make sure to have a side salad along with your ego.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
