i feel like this actually would violate the first amendmenthttps://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/1416101387881046020 …
-
-
determination of what is what is another topic; f.ex: supreme court can decide what is what, but one has to provide tangible/scientific/empirical, what ever proof one can provide. telling covid vaccination is a global conspiracy tied with 5g should be protected under 1st?
-
maybe it should, but deliberate conspiracy / fraud is still a criminal act
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
your point is; such tool can be exploited to oppress other voices, which is a legit concern. but just because we are too lazy/disorganized to find a solution, shouldn’t mean we have to legalize bullshit under the first, or love of guns under 2nd.
-
current institutions cannot be entrusted with the drop of being the arbiters of the truth. we have to stop short of multiplatform banhammers
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
