There's already such intense competition for grants that many professors spend most of their time on grant proposals. Adding more people to that system accomplishes little. Outside academia, a business degree is a better financial choice than a physics degree.
-
-
Replying to @peroxycarbonate @atroyn and
There aren't jobs for more hard-science people in America. But there *is* a surplus of capital floating around, that could fund jobs. I think the problem is a failure of allocation, and the success of an absurd VC investment models shows the amount of inefficiency present.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
i’m not sure you and i are in any way disagreeing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atroyn
Right, I misunderstood what you meant by "production" of elites, & how much you meant "the current university system" by "education". Sorry. But I still feel there's some dispute... Investors do *try* to invest in the kinds of people you suggest, and then keep losing money.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peroxycarbonate @atroyn
So the question is, what are they doing wrong? And I think we have some disagreement on *that* point. Bill Gates invests in, say,
@DanielleFong. She's smart. She has an idea. The startup fails. The pattern repeats, again and again. So what's the problem?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @DanielleFong @atroyn
Would you *like* a more in-depth analysis of your particular case? I can do that, if you're sure you want one!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peroxycarbonate @atroyn
there’s probably no way to do a very good job at this without details that have not been published, so i deleted my tweet the background situation of 4 cleantech funding busts (07-09,11,14,15 china, ‘16) & exponentially dropping li ion cost is probably the single biggest factor
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @atroyn
No, compressed air energy storage was never economically viable. Not with underground caverns, but *certainly* not with compressed air tanks. I told you at the time that if you could actually make much cheaper compressed gas tanks then you should sell them as CNG tanks instead.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peroxycarbonate @atroyn
your certainty about this is based on what? not all truths are intuitive. anyway we did sell tanks in the CNG market. in addition to having lower materials and processing cost that the steel, over the road trailers had 6x the storage of steel trailers for the same weight limit
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
but after the compressor program was shut down nobody was interested in funding enough to actually build a tank factory, we were pushed to license our tech to a company which dragged their feet to implement and then did a redesign to avoid royalties. waste of potential...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
