the amount of just ... straight up disinformation that uninformed humans are generating about bitcoin is really something todayhttps://twitter.com/DanielleFong/status/1384206262045351952 …
you make a stronger claim that, say 1000x usage will make no (direct?) influence to the price or the energy usage, or the fees. i don't see that happening. ultimately the fees will pay the miner's energy expense, more demand/use = more fees, & i don't see how they are bounded
-
-
& the ability of level 2 like lightning or coinbase to glom together transactions, yet this is a partial solution, but it's not complete, afaict. the value of writing to a ledger between say Robinhood and Coinbase could be >>100x higher than the $23-$50 per transaction now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

forgive me, i mean to say that i'm still quite dubious as to the claim! i think it's being dunked on to quote tweet like that when the claim is at least debatable.
transaction scale, price, fees, energy use - these are really completely decoupled? not completely