by all means prove me wrong
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not either or. yes, and.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I saw a proponent of direct capture argue that it made sense. He said that due to the kinetics of the particular processes, the thermodynamic disadvantage of doing it in ambient air was surprisingly small relative to flue gas. I was skeptical but
. -
This was from doing a technical writing piece on direct air capture a few years back. I could have fact checked it but wasn't paid to do so. (And didn't have spare motivation and energy for it.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Done all the time....called “plants”
-
yeah, yeah, they do do that, are you going to match plants for surface area?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
For capture, GRAPHENE filter tech is in the future. Electric cars + nextGEN nuclear = oil demand destruction = centralized carbon capture (less carbon cars) = f*cked up economics for plastic production (which is poisoning us and killing our ocean ecosystem)
-
how does graphene help capture co2?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Carbonates are at roughly 1.8mM in the ocean, up from roughly 1.5mM preindustrial. Capturing carbon there mitigates ocean acidification more directly. Also, SR15 goals aren’t stretch-goals. They amount to slowing the acceleration of the ongoing mega-extinction. 1/
-
If we want to actually decelerate it any time soon, CDR is essential. 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
