does the fact that an aircraft engine exploded in mid-air yet landed safely and everyone appears fine give you more or less confidence in the design of the aircraft?
-
-
Subtle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lmao I’m so sad cuz I trusted more AF
I’m moving to Victorville honestly.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah, the red-dotted Allied plane, which evolved its colour pattern to keep its main predator, the common German flak, away. It succeeded. Evolution at its finest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I used to have a lecturer showed this picture once and asked “how do you interpret this picture” almost all said “need better protection on red dot clusters” he told “all the vital areas are well protected, plane kept flying, mission done” it was an eye opener practice for me (:
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is that a good analogy here? There were large numbers of WW2 bombers available to examine.
-
well, obviously the analogy falls apart because there's not shrapnel blasting through stuff in this case -- the engine exploded itself. it is only a weak analogy I am just mainly saying all things are subject to survivor bias!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
