Wanting to completely kill an institution w/o very careful thought feels naïve, esp when best case fix is to amend. Easy to point out flaws and sometimes it is time for a full on revolution, but I wonder if all of our bias lately to torch centuries of work & roll dice is unwise?
-
-
What I'm saying is that non-revolution can leave messy wounds that fester. Reform & succession are great in theory... but if you don't address the former problem properly it will keep on being a problem. (right wing with fascistic tendencies is a problem in judges etc. in Spain)
-
Wasn't telling you off or trying to patronize you or any such thing. Just that in essence you may be right - but in practise sometimes a revolution will deal with the problem whereas a reform won't.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
