While it seems to affect a tiny percentage of people, it merits looking into. Even if it affected 1 in 1 million, we should still look into it. Not a reason for most people to not get vaccinated.
-
-
Replying to @Pravduh15 @professor_surf and
Perhaps, if you have already suffered from severe thrombocytopenic, you might want to exercise caution. I report the news as I find out.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Pravduh15 @nanogenomic and
Can you define “news” for me? Because I’m not really all that certain that a screenshot of a random Gmail account is evidence of reportable news, let alone “news” that substantiates “several reports” of this rare condition.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @professor_surf @nanogenomic and
Some deaths naturally occur in a population. It is not crazy to examine deaths surrounding a new medical technology in search of causation. Obv rare, but if it is vaccine related, that's important to note. https://www.kake.com/story/43150581/death-of-florida-doctor-after-receiving-covid19-vaccine-under-investigation …https://www.ocregister.com/2021/01/26/health-care-worker-dies-after-second-dose-of-covid-vaccine-investigations-underway …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pravduh15 @professor_surf and
They are important to track and take note of and examine to determine overall risks (which seem extremely low) but still important none the less. Feel free to call me a media conglomerate, if that term suits you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pravduh15 @nanogenomic and
I also find
@nanogenomic retweeting this classic, as this has been his narrative: 1. Vaccines won’t work 2. Vaccines will cause massive cases of ADE 3. Now, vaccines are killing people!! “Completely unrelated, I am creating revolutionary peptides to prevent Covid.”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @professor_surf @nanogenomic and
Look. I just do news. Nano has a revolutionary approach that can be utilized alone or with vaccines. Thus aside, it's important accurately and timely report the news. I do news.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pravduh15 @nanogenomic and
So if I take a screenshot of a random Gmail thread that says a random Hawaii Professor won the Nobel Peace Prize, would you laugh at me or would it be one of those “Might be, might not be, but important to report” things? Because that’s pretty much what you’re doing here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @professor_surf @nanogenomic and
Your Twitter page, you do what you want with it. Here's the deal. If about 1 in 1 million people vaccinated have an adverse reaction that bears looking into, but 1 in 300 people with COVID die, then is it a hard choice for you?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pravduh15 @professor_surf and
Should we still look into those 1 in 1 million events and try to figure out what is happening to prevent it? Sure. It does not, however, mean that you shouldn't get the vaccine.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
getting this info from alex bereson though, who has flipped the boso bit with me. i have seen other reporting of this problem though as with the norway reporting. there may be a problem. it could also be propaganda though
-
-
Replying to @DanielleFong @professor_surf and
Good point. I think it's important to keep an open mind as new facts are constantly presenting. It is a relatively new tech and we should have tons of new data at the end of this year and next.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
