i was waiting for someone else to comment on this, but the variant they’ve detected in the SF Bay Area, California, is called L452R. this is the first variant I’ve had such an easy time remembering, because it’s name is nearly ‘LASER’ in 1337speek)
-
Show this thread
-
-
it’s no joke, in addition to numbers we’re a case of someone having been infected with a past strain and hit *again* with this one.pic.twitter.com/9uM4KadMzy
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @aptlyamphoteric
well there already was some that was *much* more infectious and largely took over. the D614G variant. my friend
@PLURplus worked on this, among others0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @aptlyamphoteric @PLURplus
there are some pretty interesting graphs showing how that one took over. they did a lot of early tests on it in Texas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielleFong @aptlyamphoteric
I am not sure how dangerous this one is. A single mutation in spike is unlikely to bypass the vaccine too much, but E484K seems to weaken prior immunity significantly. 8 months between infections is a long time for a coronavirus so maybe just waning immunity?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
i’m not sure if it’s just one mutation but this one in particular is shared a lot, but it seems like circumstantial evidence that it’s been more contagious if it’s making up 50% of LA samples
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
